Communio: Faith & the Public Order Archives

Kim Geiger of the LA Times manipulates readership

By

on November 13, 2009 1:55 PM | Permalink | Comments (2)

Getting the story correct, checking facts and clear writing is not one of Kim Geiger of the LA Times better skills. Geiger's recent article claiming that the US Bishops supported and/or told the Catholic faithful to support the Democratic bill on healthcare reform is wrong. Does the LA Times still hire fact checkers? Do reporters still speak to real people, perhaps 2-3 sources prior to publication?

What Ms Geiger confuses for legitimate Catholic authority in teaching and governing the Church is really a left-leaning group claiming to work in the ambit of the Church's Social Teaching. It seems as though Ms Geiger does know the basics of Catholic teaching very well. Did you get that sense from her article? Catholics United support the Pelosi-Obama agenda. Catholics United does not speak for the US Conference of Bishops; neither do they speak for local pastors nor for the faithful Catholic. As Dan Gilgoff said in his US News.com article on October 28th, Catholics United "provides cover for the White House and the Democrats."

If you want to know what the bishops are saying, read the press lease of November 9, 2009. US Conference President, Francis Cardinal George is clear on what the bishops think about healthcare reform. And form what I can gather, I don't think the bishops completely agree with the Democratic party's version of the healthcare reform bill.

So, Archbishop Dolan's recent nonpublished NY Times piece is actually correct (which we knew all the time): there is verifiable proof of bias in the media against the Catholic Church in the USA.

Subsidiarity lacks with the President

By

Paul Zalonski

on August 7, 2009 7:42 AM | Permalink

Msgr Lorenzo Albacete points to a lack of understanding of the principle of subsidiarity that's going to challenge President Obama's healthcare reform work. AND what is the principle of subsidiarity? It's principle that nothing should be done at macro level that ought to be done at the micro level. So, the state should not impose its method on a municipality because the municipality ought to find a solution. If it can't then you move up to the next reasonable level. See a sketch of the principle.

Read Albacete's article.

God unites & sustains society

By

Paul Zalonski

on June 1, 2009 9:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Two weeks ago in the School of Community we were discussing the answer Msgr. Giussani gave to a questioner who asks if it is reasonable for a non-believer to ask Christ for anything: Giussani says that it is completely reasonable to ask Christ to answer our needs because He is the answer to absolutely everything. Wow! Christ is the answer to everything for all time. Period. Christ is the answer is THE to every question, to every concern we have. Now, let's be serious: we're not saying Christ is the answer to whether we'll eat pasta or cereal today. He's the answer to questions of meaning, faith, vision, fulfillment, etc. What follows here is the Pope is addressing the matter of how and why the Church is engaged in culture. This is the same work that the World Youth Alliance is doing and what Communion & Liberation is about; the pope's explanation of ecclessial engagement in culture is reasonable. No?

The Church's engagement with civil society is anchored in her conviction that authentic human progress -- whether as individuals or communities -- is dependent upon the recognition of the spiritual dimension proper to every person. It is from God that men and women receive their essential dignity (cf. Gen 1:27) and the capacity to transcend particular interests in order to seek truth and goodness and so find purpose and meaning in their lives. This broad perspective provides a framework within which it is possible to counter any tendency to adopt superficial approaches to social policy which address only the symptoms of negative trends in family life and communities, rather than their roots. Indeed, when humanity's spiritual heart is brought to light, individuals are drawn beyond themselves to ponder God and the marvels of human life: being, truth, beauty, moral values, and relationships that respect the dignity of others. In this way a sure foundation to unite society and sustain a common vision of hope can be found.

(Pope Benedict XVI's address to the new Ambassador of New Zealand to the Holy See Robert Carey Moore-Jones, May 29, 2009)

Connecticut State Ethics Office charges Diocese of Bridgeport violated law

By

Paul Zalonski

on May 29, 2009 2:24 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Connecticut State Officials try to muzzle the Church! In a letter to the people of the Diocese of Bridgeport today, Bishop William Lori states that the gathering of people to protest Bill 1098 that would violate the First Amendment, was a violation of law. The State of Connecticut Ethics committee said this mobilizing of the people amounted to "lobbying" because the Diocese failed to register as a lobbyist (which would invite State regulation). Now the claim is that the Diocese is subject to penalties.

Exhorting the people, i.e., giving information to the people, encouraging the people to take part in democracy, forming the consciences of the people from the pulpit, web-based materials and rallying does not constitute lobbying.

Nutmegers need to contact the State legislator before the end of the legislative session this coming Wednesday.

The Diocese of Bridgeport is filing a civil rights lawsuit in Federal Court against the State of Connecticut seeking relief from government action on this ruling.

For more information see the Diocese of Bridgeport website.

How Obama became Christian

By

Paul Zalonski

on May 25, 2009 7:48 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Lorenzo Albacete writes today about President Obama's becoming Christian. Apparently the President said:

"Perhaps because the church folk I worked with were so welcoming and understanding, perhaps because they invited me to their services and sang with me from their hymnals, perhaps because I was really broke and they fed me. Perhaps because I witnessed all of the good work their faith inspired them to perform, I found myself drawn not just to work with the Church. I was drawn to be in the Church. It was through this service that I was brought to Christ."

Read Msgr. Albacete's analysis the story.

The President & Prayer

By

Paul Zalonski

on May 7, 2009 9:00 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

This evening the Pastor and I attended the local observance of the 58th Annual observance of the National Day of Prayer. This year's theme was "Prayer...America's Hope." The occasion was OK. It was Scripture-based with free prayer offered for certain areas of concern (business, family, education, military, government, church). I was only impressed that 50 gathered for prayer for the nation, state and city; I wasn't particularly impressed by the concern for all faiths to be represented. One significant disappointment was that it was too Christian, (too evangelical) and not interfaith. This is not the typical complaint you would ordinarily hear from me but the fact is event was the National Day of Prayer it was designed to be inclusive of the city's various faith traditions. I freely admit that many occasions of prayer done in the interfaith mode are vapid and simply not done well. The representatives of the Jewish and Muslim faiths were not present and neither were the Buddhist monks nor the Episcopalians nor Lutherans. It would've been good to have the clergypeople from the various ecclesial communities and interfaith communities present, but let's be careful not to fall into the trap of essentialism.

The National Day of Prayer was established in 1952 by President Truman and President Reagan determined by resolution in 1988 to observe the day on the first Thursday of May.

The problem I have with President Obama on this matter is that he decided to sideline public observance of prayer under the guise that he didn't want to wear his faith on his cufflinks. Fine, don't make a show it. But let's be honest, does the President think he can run the country without God? Does he think that his example is good leadership? So, ultimately I can accept that the White House would not have its own prayer time but that they would not attend any of the other prayer observances in the District, including the National Day of Prayer Task Force, I find arrogant.

The President's press secretary Robert Gibbs says that "Prayer is something the President does everyday." Really? I am unconvinced.

Of course, the President can neither tell us to pray nor how to pray but he does open the possibility for the nation to pray for the good of the nation by his own witness. If an atheist were chagrined by a prayer day then that person could simply observe a moment of silence or offer a poem that lends itself to the ideal of patriotism or the common good. Whatever the case may be in today's context, the point is that is important to gather people of good will with the hope of being united in something spiritual, something that takes the other person's destiny seriously.

For those interested in some further thinking on ecumenism and interfaith matters, I recommend Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI's Truth and Tolerance: Christian Belief and World Religions (Ignatius Press, 2004).