Charity is the only good reason to do anything

| | Comments (2)

The Cistercian monk, philosopher and theologian Isaac of Stella (1100-1169) was featured in the Office of Readings today: Charity is the reason why anything should be done or left undone.

Charity is the only good reason to do anything, but it also sometimes demands that we not do something we might think we want to do. There are a lot of fine distinctions one has to make in this area to live spiritually in common life and ministry. For example:

  • We are called to support one another, but not to enable maladaptive behaviors, debilitating addictions, and sins. We must bear with the burdens of others, and be willing to wash feet, but we should not take responsibility for the feelings of others.
  • We must seek ways to invite both individuals and institutions to benefit from our strengths, and invite them into the success that derives from them, but--again--we should be careful not to take interior or exterior responsibility for situations that the Holy Spirit has not, or not yet, seen fit to put in our care.
  • Sometimes the greatest charity--and often the most painful--is not giving someone what he thinks he wants.
  • We must be good to ourselves, practicing good self-care, but that doesn't mean taking it easy and just 'being nice' to ourselves. On the one hand, we must not be so hard on ourselves that our whole spiritual life becomes a rehearsal of faults and sins, for this is one of the devil's tricks in making us fail to notice God, and on the other we must also be careful not be overly forgiving of ourselves so as to effectively give up struggling with certain selfishnesses and sins.
  • We must practice the sort of self-charity that nourishes our gifts and virtues, and is ruthless in the unwillingness to put up with sin.
Thanks to my friend Friar Charles for providing grist for the mill.

2 Comments

Keep up the work, friend.

Charity that nourishes the gifts and virtues in ourselves and others. -This is a wonderful directive.-

Ruthless in the unwillingness to put up with sin. How ruthless? Is this in the same vein as to admonish sinners? To be intolerant?

In the idea of "practicing good self-care" and "not just being nice to ourselves" this makes sense. We should not tolerate the commission of sin in ourselves. But accept the Grace of forgiveness from our Lord when we fall. I'm just stuck on "ruthless."

Am I too focused on the semantics, or the "letter?"

Thanks for your efforts.

PAX

Leave a comment

About the author

Paul A. Zalonski is from New Haven, CT. He is a member of the Fraternity of Communion and Liberation, a Catholic ecclesial movement and an Oblate of Saint Benedict. Contact Paul at paulzalonski[at]yahoo.com.

Categories

Archives

Humanities Blog Directory

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Paul Zalonski published on February 12, 2011 4:47 PM.

Breast cancer and St Agatha: supporting those who live with the disease was the previous entry in this blog.

Saints Cyril and Methodius is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.