Bartholomew takes on critics of dialog, establishes Orthodox concern for Church unity

| | Comments (5)

I've provided here excerpts of Bartholomew I's Patriarchal and Synodal Encyclical, published on the Sunday of Orthodoxy (February 21, 2010). The letter was not only published under the name of Patriarch Bartholomew, but it was signed by 12 other bishops. The Patriarch is obviously trying to calm the irrational fears stirred up by some extreme Orthodox thinkers. No doubt there are significant, well-crafted --though ludicrous--objections to the dialogic process between the churches.

 

Catholics have their own irrational critics of the ecumenical movement, but I think there is sometimes good reason for the ecumenical leaders to pay attention to thoughtful criticism. I think we have been saddled with misguided "ecumenists" who capitulate to others some substantial matters like the nature of truth, morals, the sacred Liturgy, dogma, ecclesiology, teaching authority, etc.

 

But with this patriarchal letter, Bartholomew sets the stage for thinking intelligently and faithfully in an effort to work toward unity among Christians, without which the Christian witness to Christ as Lord and Savior and the sacramentality of the Church is weakened. There are matters raised by the critics that need to be dealt with directly, like: To what end do the dialogues aim? Is full, visible unity possible, or are we wasting our time? Can a selective reading of history be set aside and real scholarship emerge to shed light on historical events and gestures and theological reflection? How do we discern the work of the Holy Spirit in the dialogues? Are truth claims made by the Churches (Rome and Constantinople) accurate and faithful to the Lord? Are the bishops obstructionists or men of good will?

 

Funny, this letter will be read by the Catholic world on the ancient feast of the Chair of Peter on who whose witness we rely on for Christian unity. Would that the irony might be an opportunity for more concrete expressions unity of life in Christ. What Bartholomew says of the Orthodox Church is applicable to the Roman Church. Emphasis is mine.

 

May Saint Peter and Saint Andrew with Mary, Mother of God, pray for us. 

 

Bartholomew I.jpgWith a sense of duty and responsibility, despite its hurdles and problems, as the First-Throne Church of Orthodoxy, the Ecumenical Patriarchate cares about protecting and establishing the unity of the Orthodox Church, in order that with one voice and in one heart we may confess the Orthodox faith of our Fathers in every age and even in our times. For, Orthodoxy is not a museum treasure that must be preserved; it is a breath of life that must be transmitted and invigorate all people. Orthodoxy is always contemporary, so long as we promote it with humility and interpret it in light of the existential quests and needs of humanity in each historical period and cultural circumstance.

 

To this purpose, Orthodoxy must be in constant dialogue with the world. The Orthodox Church does not fear dialogue because truth is not afraid of dialogue. On the contrary, if Orthodoxy is enclosed within itself and not in dialogue with those outside, it will both fail in its mission and no longer be the "catholic" and "ecumenical" Church. Instead, it will become an introverted and self-contained group, a "ghetto" on the margins of history. This is why the great Fathers of the Church never feared dialogue with the spiritual culture of their age - indeed even with the pagan idolaters and philosophers of their world - thereby influencing and transforming the civilization of their time and offering us a truly ecumenical Church.

 

Today, Orthodoxy is called to continue this dialogue with the outside world in order to provide a witness and the life-giving breath of its faith. However, this dialogue cannot reach the outside world unless it first passes through all those that bear the Christian name. Thus, we must first converse as Christians among ourselves in order to resolve our differences, in order that our witness to the outside world may be credible. Our endeavors for the union of all Christians is the will and command of our Lord, who before His Passion prayed to His Father "that all [namely, His disciples] may be one, so that the world may believe that You sent me." (John 17.21) It is not possible for the Lord to agonize over the unity of His disciples and for us to remain indifferent about the unity of all Christians. This would constitute criminal betrayal and transgression of His divine commandment.

 

It is precisely for these reasons that, with the mutual agreement and participation of all local Orthodox Churches, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has for many decades conducted official Panorthodox theological dialogues with the larger Christian Churches and Confessions. The aim of these dialogues is, in a spirit of love, to discuss whatever divides Christians both in terms of faith as well as in terms of the organization and life of the Church.

 

These dialogues, together with every effort for peaceful and fraternal relations of the Orthodox Church with other Christians, are unfortunately challenged today in an unacceptably fanatical way - at least by the standards of a genuinely Orthodox ethos - by certain circles that exclusively claim for themselves the title of zealot and defender of Orthodoxy. As if all the Patriarchs and Sacred Synods of the Orthodox Churches throughout the world, who unanimously decided on and continue to support these dialogues, were not Orthodox. Yet, these opponents of every effort for the restoration of unity among Christians raise themselves above Episcopal Synods of the Church to the dangerous point of creating schisms within the Church.

 

In their polemical argumentation, these critics of the restoration of unity among Christians do not even hesitate to distort reality in order to deceive and arouse the faithful. Thus, they are silent about the fact that theological dialogues are conducted by unanimous decision of all Orthodox Churches, instead attacking the Ecumenical Patriarchate alone. They disseminate false rumors that union between the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches is imminent, while they know well that the differences discussed in these theological dialogues remain numerous and require lengthy debate; moreover, union is not decided by theological commissions but by Church Synods. They assert that the Pope will supposedly subjugate the Orthodox, because they latter submit to dialogue with the Roman Catholics! They condemn those who conduct these dialogues as allegedly "heretics" and "traitors" of Orthodoxy, purely and simply because they converse with non-Orthodox, with whom they share the treasure and truth of our Orthodox faith. They speak condescendingly of every effort for reconciliation among divided Christians and restoration of their unity as purportedly being "the pan-heresy of ecumenism" without providing the slightest evidence that, in its contacts with non-Orthodox, the Orthodox Church has abandoned or denied the doctrines of the Ecumenical Councils and of the Church Fathers.

 

Beloved children in the Lord, Orthodoxy has no need of either fanaticism or bigotry to protect itself. Whoever believes that Orthodoxy has the truth does not fear dialogue, because truth has never been endangered by dialogue. By contrast, when in our day all people strive to resolve their differences through dialogue, Orthodoxy cannot proceed with intolerance and extremism. You should have utmost confidence in your Mother Church. For the Mother Church has over the ages preserved and transmitted Orthodoxy even to other nations. And today, the Mother Church is struggling amid difficult circumstances to maintain Orthodoxy vibrant and venerable throughout the world.

5 Comments

Thanks for posting this Paul. I was very distressed to receive an e-mail last week from a former parishioner who left the parish almost 3 years ago. In his e-mail he told that he had become Orthodox and affiliated with a Russian Orthodox mission in the Salt Lake Valley. This is not what I found distressing, however. He and I had been in dialogue for a long time about this. So, it hardly came as a surprise. What surprised, or, more accurately, offended me was that in becoming Orthodox he was re-baptized and chrismated.

Your post was most needed.

Scott

That letter by Bartholomew says a lot. Fr. Paul, you say "this letter will be read by the Catholic world on the ancient feast of the Chair of Peter " but I can't find any references on the Catholic news or the Internet. Why would we have this read? Is is approved by the Vatican? Thank you.

Dear Jonathan,

The Patriarch's letter was released yesterday and is now being picked up by Catholic news agencies around world, on this, the feast of the Chair of Peter. I suppose Catholics would read this letter because they are genuinely interested in what others think especially when it comes to matters of faith, Christian unity and ecclesial relations. Sorry for being unclear in my original statement.

PAZ

happy to help. one of the distressing matters of hearing about Catholics moving to the Orthodox Church are the excuses and weak arguments for the move...much third level concern. rarely do Catholics move away from the Catholic Church because of some dogma/doctrine. the last time you heard someone move because of the Trinity or the resurrection. with matters of belief, it is astounding to hear the people speak about a particular theologian, eg, Aquinas or Bonaventure, as magisterial teaching and conclusive in formulating church teaching. they may have informed certain theological perspectives and doctrine but the church has the final say and manner of making the teaching known. the ability to distinguish theological opinion, even if it Aquinas' from what the Church teaches is not very good. when it comes to pastoral practice in receiving Catholics into their Church the Orthodox clergy are not too informed, or dismissive of commonly held sacramental theology, as in the case you mention. having said that, some Catholic clergy are all that informed either.

i, too, am happy for Bartholomew's letter.

Deacon Scott,

Why is this upsetting to you? THIS is the position of the Orthodox - in spite of all the rhetoric of those involved in Ecumenism. If you examine the teaching of the Orthodox Saints who have written on the matter of whether or not mysteries can exist outside the Church (St. Basil the Great, St. Nikodemos the Agiorite, St. Hilarion Troitsky (the new Martyrs of Russia), for example), they are unanimous that they cannot and that baptism is the normal way of entry. They all say that in receiving someone by chrismation the Church is NOT recognizing their baptism PER SE, but only by way of "oikonomia". That is, upon becoming Orthodox, the Church gives content and life to the empty forms of the mysteries existing outside the Church.

Anyway, one could go on, but you get the point, right?

All you who are enthusiastic by Patriarch Bartholomew's rhetoric and enthusiasm should realize that he is only one man and not the Pope, nor even a Bishop with much of a flock. The Orthodox Church is SYNODICAL, that is Her voice is heard in Synod. But even these cannot go against the clear teaching of the Saints - without risking being called robber synods by later generations.

Leave a comment

About the author

Paul A. Zalonski is from New Haven, CT. He is a member of the Fraternity of Communion and Liberation, a Catholic ecclesial movement and an Oblate of Saint Benedict. Contact Paul at paulzalonski[at]yahoo.com.

Categories

Archives

Humanities Blog Directory

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Paul Zalonski published on February 22, 2010 10:56 AM.

Luigi Giussani: the 5th anniversary of death was the previous entry in this blog.

Basilica made in Stamford, Connecticut by Pope Benedict is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.