{"id":26651,"date":"2011-09-14T07:38:01","date_gmt":"2011-09-14T11:38:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/2011\/09\/sspx-insulting-pope-benedict\/"},"modified":"2011-09-14T07:38:01","modified_gmt":"2011-09-14T11:38:01","slug":"sspx-insulting-pope-benedict","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/2011\/09\/sspx-insulting-pope-benedict\/","title":{"rendered":"SSPX insulting Pope Benedict?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I raise the question of the Society of Saint Pius X insulting Pope Benedict with a degree of seriousness. Why? Because when I read the article that was written by Father Regis de Cacqueray and published with the approval of the SSPX Superior General Bishop Bernard Fellay, I thought while many of the ideas need to be understood better and are worthy of further investigation, de Cacqueray&#8217;s seeming intentions and tone are really offensive and unbecoming of a priest.<\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>As Pope Benedict has said and indicated many times, no one is above scrutiny. Charity requires the teaching of truth; the first item of justice ought to be charitable discourse to correct error. I do, however, think&nbsp;Father Regis de Cacqueray&#8217;s&nbsp;rhetoric is rather inflamatory.<\/p>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>Read for yourself &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/sspx.org\/district_news\/renewing_the_assisi_scandal_fr_cacqueray-9-13-2011.htm\">Renewing the Assisi Scandal: Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum<\/a>&#8220;<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div><i>The National Review<\/i> had <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/277128\/tell-us-what-you-really-think-michael-potemra\">an opinion piece<\/a> on the issue, too.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>AND all this around the days of serious conversation between the Holy See and the SSPX!!!<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>What do you think?<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I raise the question of the Society of Saint Pius X insulting Pope Benedict with a degree of seriousness. Why? Because when I read the article that was written by Father Regis de Cacqueray and published with the approval of the SSPX Superior General Bishop Bernard Fellay, I thought while many of the ideas need &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/2011\/09\/sspx-insulting-pope-benedict\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">SSPX insulting Pope Benedict?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[55,7],"tags":[2602,2866,1907,32081,1769,1941],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26651"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26651\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/communio.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}